Cases 1 - 10 of 587
US v. Luther Satterfield
as 24-6471
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LUTHER EARL SATTERFIELD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02774
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Satterfield v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 1:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Nicole Satterfield
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Marcus Satterfield v. Timothy Vaughn
as 24-6298
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ANTONIO SATTERFIELD
Defendant:
TIMOTHY VAUGHN
Marcus Satterfield v. T. J. Knaub
as 24-6295
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ANTONIO SATTERFIELD
Defendant:
OFFICER T. J. KNAUB, Police Officer of the R.P.D. Roxboro and ROXBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT
Marcus Satterfield v. J. F. Seifert
as 24-6296
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ANTONIO SATTERFIELD
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER JAMES F. SEIFERT, NOW DETECTIVE and ROXBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT
Marcus Satterfield v. Police Officer J.F. Seifert
as 24-6279
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ANTONIO SATTERFIELD
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER J. F. SEIFERT, NOW DETECTIVE and ROXBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Marcus Satterfield v. Hollie Mccaddams
as 24-6196
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ANTONIO SATTERFIELD
Defendant:
HOLLIE MCCADDAMS, ADA IN SUPERIOR COURTS ROXBORO NC PERSON COUNTY SUED IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITY, MERILYN P. NEWELL, MAYOR OF ROXBORO CITY OF ROXBORO SUED IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITY, JOSH STEIN, ATTORNEY GENERALS COMMISSIONER SUED IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
