Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Wilson v. Mount Diablo Unified School District/Special Education Local Plan Area (Diablo) et al
as 3:2020cv03368
Defendant:
City of Concord, Jose A. Espinoza, Darryl R. Saffold and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Geary Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. City of Walnut Creek et al
as 4:2020cv02721
Defendant:
City of Walnut Creek, Darryl R. Saffold, Sean Michael Conley and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Geary Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Schwarz
as 17-975
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Daniel Schwarz, AKA Daniel James Schwartz, AKA Daniel James Maccio, AKA Scott Brian Williams, AKA Brian Williams, AKA Daniel Bryan Williams, AKA Daniel James Wetherwell, AKA Donald Maccio, AKA Danny Schwarz, AKA Maccio Schwarz
Carmichael & Dame Designs, Inc. et al v. Carhart Lumber Company et al
as 8:2016cv00051
Defendant:
Brenda Kuhlman Carhart, Scott Brian Carhart, William C. Carhart and others
Plaintiff:
Carmichael & Dame Designs, Inc., Design Basics, L.L.C. and Prime Designs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Mudford v. Brown et al
as 2:2016cv10104
Plaintiff:
Scott Brian Mudford
Defendant:
Elwood Brown, Edward Messing, Professional Counseling Center, PC and others
Scott Steffler v. Brian Belleque
as 14-35280
Petitioner - Appellant:
SCOTT BRIAN STEFFLER
Respondent - Appellee:
BRIAN BELLEQUE
Design Basics, LLC v. Carhart Lumber Company et al
as 8:2013cv00125
Defendant:
Brenda Kuhlman Carhart, William C. Carhart, Carhart Lumber Company and others
Plaintiff:
Design Bascis, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Scott Steffler v. Brian Belleque
as 13-35053
Petitioner - Appellant:
SCOTT BRIAN STEFFLER
Respondent - Appellee:
BRIAN BELLEQUE
Saverino v. Rameriz et al
as 4:2011cv00104
Plaintiff:
Vince D Saverino
Defendant:
Unknown Rameriz, Unknown Woods, Unknown Lavique and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
