Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Haynes v. USA et al
as 4:2014cv00186
Plaintiff:
Scott Haynes
Defendant:
USA, Bethany Dennehy and Brian Farr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 3:2012cv00022
Plaintiff:
Scott Haynes
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams et al v. Bayer Cropscience LP et al
as 4:2011cv00027
Plaintiff:
Leo Chico Williams, III , Pete Williams , Leo Williams, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Bayer CropScience LP , Bayer Cropscience Holding, Inc. , Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams et al v. Bayer Cropscience LP et al
as 4:2010cv00148
Plaintiff:
Leo "Chico&quo Williams, III , Pete Williams , Leo Williams, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Bayer Cropscience LP, Bayer Cropscience Holding, Inc., Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott Haynes v. Ricardo Martinez, et al
as 09-6300
Petitioner - Appellant:
SCOTT HAYNES
Respondent - Appellee:
RICARDO MARTINEZ, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Allenwood, PA and JACK CONWAY, Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Kentucky
HAYNES v. AQUA-CHEM INC et al
as 2:2009cv70166
Plaintiff:
WENDELL SCOTT HAYNES
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM INC, BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC INC, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Wendell Scott Haynes v. Aqua-Chem, Inc., et al.
as SC/8:09-CV-00974
Plaintiff:
Wendell Scott Haynes
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc
Haynes v. Aqua-Chem Inc et al
as 8:2009cv00974
Plaintiff:
Wendell Scott Haynes
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem Inc, Borg-Warner Morse TEC Inc, Certainteed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Haynes v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 5:2008cv00190
Petitioner:
Scott Haynes
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Haynes v. Allied Interstate Inc
as 3:2008cv05163
Plaintiff:
Scott Haynes
Defendant:
Allied Interstate Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
