Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Howard Carter v. Kathleen Kane, et al
as 16-3731
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant:
KATHLEEN KANE, BRIAN COLEMAN, DARRELL O. DUGAN and others
Howard Carter v. Kathleen Kane, et al
as 16-3731
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN G. KANE, BRIAN COLEMAN, DARRELL O. DUGAN and others
Allah v. Murphy
as 16-3137
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Khalaire Allah
Defendant - Appellee:
Sgt. Murphy, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, J. Fuller, Correction Officer, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, T. Tynon, ADSP, Great Meadow Correctional Facility and others
Defendant:
M. Rock, Correction Officer, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, P. Londrigan, Correction Officer, Great Meadow Correctional Facility and D. VanBuren, Executive Asst. Comm., DOCCS
Vaughan v. Cowan et al
as 3:2016cv00224
Plaintiff:
Dominique T. Vaughan
Defendant:
Cpt. Cowan and Sgt. Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Underwood v. Schofield et al
as 3:2015cv00533
Plaintiff:
Xavion L Underwood
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, David Sexton, S Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booth v. Doehling et al
as 2:2015cv01253
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Booth
Defendant:
L Doehling , Sharon Moerchen, C Barter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allah v. Murphy et al
as 9:2014cv00438
Plaintiff:
Khalaire Allah
Defendant:
Sgt. Murphy, M. Rock, J. Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mawson v. Pittston City Police Department et al
as 3:2013cv01714
Plaintiff:
Robert William Mawson, Sr.
Defendant:
Pittston City Police Department , Officer Moyer , Sgt. Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whitfield v. City of Newburgh et al
as 7:2008cv08516
Plaintiff:
Susan Whitfield
Defendant:
City of Newburgh, SGT. Murphy, Howard Ladlee and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
