Cases 1 - 10 of 100
US v. Malik Al-Shabazz
as 26-4356
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MALIK AL-SHABAZZ, a/k/a Beaver, a/k/a Beaver G
Jones v. Sopphire
as 4:2026cv00177
Plaintiff:
Devontay Shabazz Jones
Defendant:
Ralph Sopphire
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Barren v. The State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Department of Corrections, et al.
as 26-3413
Plaintiff:
DONALD ROBIN BARREN
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEVADA EX REL. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TOM LAWSON, P. JORDAN and others
Hakim v. Staso et al
as 1:2026cv02892
Plaintiff:
Shabazz Hakim
Defendant:
OFC. Staso, OFC. Matthew Cole, David Beam and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Shabazz v. Newcomer et al
as 7:2026cv00417
Plaintiff:
Wazir M. Shabazz
Defendant:
David Newcomer, A. David Robinson, Arlene Mulder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butts v. Taylor et al
as 4:2026cv11544
Plaintiff:
Stanley K. Butts and Kimba Shabazz
Defendant:
Marlena Taylor, Mark Gabrielle and Bonita Hoffman
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Shabazz v. LaRose, et al.
as 1:2026cv01032
Defendant:
Frank LaRose and Cuyahoga County Board of Elections
Plaintiff:
Tariq K. Shabazz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shabazz v. VXI Global Solutions
as 1:2026cv01105
Plaintiff:
Coretta Shabazz
Defendant:
VXI Global Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ibn-Woods v. Thornell, et al.
as 26-2504
Plaintiff:
MUJAHID ABDUL-MALIK SHABAZZ IBN-WOODS
Defendant:
RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, DAVID SHINN, UNKNOWN HENRY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
