Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Shabazz v. Federal Express Corporation
as 4:2026cv09897
Plaintiff:
Alfono Shabazz
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Shabazz v. Ace Property
as 26-10798
Plaintiff:
Ramadan T. Shabazz, doing business as Kickz
Defendant:
Ace Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Lisenby v. Ray
as 5:2026cv03156
Petitioner:
Billy Lee Lisenby, Jr and Malik Al-Shabazz
Respondent:
Director Patricia Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
US v. Malik Al-Shabazz
as 26-4356
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MALIK AL-SHABAZZ, a/k/a Beaver, a/k/a Beaver G
CHAMBERS v. ALIMEGISTUS ECCE HOMO EH-YEH AH-SHER EH-YEH MUHAAMID ALA'AD-DIN EL-BEY SHABAZZ, ED.D.
as 2:2026cv08929
Plaintiff:
JASON LAMAR CHAMBERS, JASON LAMAR CHAMBERS RAPHAEL AMIN-BEY and ADMIRAL ALA
Defendant:
ALIMEGISTUS ECCE HOMO EH-YEH AH-SHER EH-YEH MUHAAMID ALA'AD-DIN EL-BEY SHABAZZ, ED.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Jones v. Sopphire
as 4:2026cv00177
Plaintiff:
Devontay Shabazz Jones
Defendant:
Ralph Sopphire
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Sankona Graham vs. A Amacker, et al
as 2:2026cv01859
Plaintiff:
Sankona Graham
Defendant:
Amanda Amacker, B. Silber, Estill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EL-SHABAZZ v. VINARDI
as 1:2026cv01174
Petitioner:
AKHENATON EL-SHABAZZ
Respondent:
KEITH VINARDI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fraction v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2026cv00831
Plaintiff:
Jamal Fraction
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Monica White, Veronica Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
