Cases 1 - 10 of 9,409
Wattenbarger v. City of Crossville, Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Wallace Shane Wattenbarger
Defendant:
City of Crossville, Tennessee, Officer Samantha Seay, Officer Ethan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fiorentino v. United States Government
as 0:2024cv02227
Plaintiff:
Shane Fiorentino
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SHEETS v. DADY et al
as 2:2024cv00831
Petitioner:
RICHARD SHEETS
Respondent:
SHANE DADY and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cypress Insurance Company v. Foley et al
as 7:2024cv00746
Plaintiff:
Cypress Insurance Company
Defendant:
Shane Foley, Jeremy Pope and Chris Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
PALM v. CORRCARE INC et al
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
GREGORY PALM
Defendant:
CORRCARE INC, DR PAUL BUCZYNSKY, JONES COUNTY GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harper v. Stevens et al
as 2:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Kevin O Harper
Defendant:
Christopher Stevens, John Kind, Dylon Radtke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scofield v. Debt USA LLC
as 1:2024cv01554
Plaintiff:
Shane Scofield
Defendant:
Debt USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Clark et al v. BRP LLC
as 5:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
Shane Clark and Jennifer Clark
Defendant:
BRP LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Jermaine Carter v. Shane Troxler, et al
as 24-2008
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE L. CARTER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and BOP BUREAU CHIEF SHANE TROXLER
David Lindsey v. Shane Heiser, et al
as 24-1950
Plaintiff:
DAVID S. LINDSEY
Defendant:
SHANE HEISER, NATHAN REBLIN, JOSHUA RICHTER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
