Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Everett v. Dean
as 23-1343
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jahmier A. Everett
Defendant / Appellee:
Shawn Dean, #3223, Investigator N.Y. State Police Officer and Ronald Lussi, #2982, Senior Investigator/Supervisor N.Y.S.P.
Albrecht v. Westenkirchner et al
as 4:2022cv04174
Plaintiff:
Shawn Dean Albrecht
Defendant:
Joshua Westenkirchner, Sgt. Arob, Warden Dan Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEAN et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv16260
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
Plaintiff:
MARGARET DEAN and SHAWN DEAN
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Everett v. Dean et al
as 3:2020cv01260
Defendant:
Shawn Dean and Ronald Lussi
Plaintiff:
Jahmier A. Everett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DEAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv03599
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHAWN DEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Washington v. City of Norfolk, Virginia, et al
as 2:2019cv00626
Defendant:
Kevin Griffin, Johnnie Herbert, Tommie Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dean v. Robertson
as 1:2018cv00651
Petitioner:
De'Shawn Dean
Respondent:
J. Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dean v. Robertson
as 2:2018cv01287
Petitioner:
De'Shawn Dean
Respondent:
J. Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Murphy v. Ajinomoto Windsor, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00131
Plaintiff:
James S. Murphy
Defendant:
Ajinomoto Windsor, Inc., Pam Cox, George Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
