Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Atas v. The New York Times Company
as 24-58
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, DEAN BAQUET, ELLEN POLLOCK and others
Defendant / Appellant:
NADIRE ATAS
Covington Speciality Insurance Company v. G & G Farms, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Covington Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
G & G Farms, Inc., John Gavin, Patricia Gavin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Atas v. The New York Times Company et al
as 1:2022cv00853
Plaintiff:
Nadire Atas
Defendant:
The New York Times Company, Dean Baquet, Ellen Pollock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Gallardo v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2019cv24326
Plaintiff:
Joseph Gallardo, Cody Vasquez, Joseph Warrington and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
GREENE v. GRAAF et al
as 2:2019cv04734
Defendant:
KENNETH HOLDSMAN, JONATHAN VAN DUSEN, VERIZON NETWORK and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN GREENE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reece v. Lett et al
as 4:2017cv00835
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dennis Reece
Defendant:
Stacey Lett, Mark Stringer, Thomas Luke Yager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eddie Murphy v. Officer Leroy Conrad
as 17-6515
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDDIE MURPHY
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER LEROY CONRAD, CO II, OFFICER DEAN W. ROUNDS, SR., CO II, OFFICER SHAWN MURRAY, CO II and others
Party-in-Interest - Appellee:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND
Aaron French v. Frank Bishop
as 17-6468
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON LITTLE FRENCH
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN FRANK BISHOP, WILLIAM BOHRER, Chief of Security, SGT. GREGORY G. FORNEY and others
Murray v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv00103
Plaintiff:
Shawn Murray
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv04360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
