Cases 1 - 8 of 8
GHASEMKHANI et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01469
Plaintiff:
ZAHRA GHASEMKHANI, SHELDON THOMPSON, DIANE TRAN and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Thompson v. Thompson et al
as 1:2022cv00935
Plaintiff:
Romy Thompson
Defendant:
Sheldon Thompson, Skye Thompson and Marie-Merced Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Thompson v. Thompson et al
as 2:2021cv01151
Defendant:
Skye Thompson, Marie Merced Thompson, Sheldon Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Ms. Romy Thompson and Romy Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. Thompson
as 3:2021cv00121
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Romy Lynn Thompson
In Re:
In the Matter of Partitioning the Property of Skye Donald Dayton Thomas and Romy Lynn Thompson
Counter Defendant:
Skye Donald Dayton Thompson
3Rd Party Defendant:
Sheldon Thompson and Marie-Merced Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thompson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 8:2017cv03276
Plaintiff:
Jay Sheldon Thompson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sheldon Thompson v. Ray Singleton, et al
as 16-4080
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Sheldon Thompson
Defendant:
Monticello, Arkansas, City of, A Public Body Corporate and Politic, Robert Rosegrant, In his Official Capacity as Chief of Police and Eddie Deaton, In his Official Capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Monticello, Arkansas
Defendant - Appellant:
Ray Singleton, In his Individual and Official Capacity as Police Officer for the City of Monticello AR
Thompson v. Monticello Arkansas, City of et al
as 5:2013cv00370
Plaintiff:
Sheldon Thompson
Defendant:
Monticello Arkansas, City of, Robert Rosegrant and Ray Singleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
