Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Morris v. The City of Rochester et al
as 6:2023cv06511
Plaintiff:
Justin Morris
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Amber Grosch, Geoffrey Quinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Noble v. Shelnut et al
as 4:2016cv00689
Plaintiff:
Marcus Andreay Noble
Defendant:
Shelnut and Briann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Pennington et al
as 4:2012cv00134
Plaintiff:
Jeffery C Bennett
Defendant:
Bruce Pennington, Don Birdsong, Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaMere v. Pennington et al
as 4:2012cv00048
Plaintiff:
Fred Michael LaMere
Defendant:
Bruce Pennington , Birdsong , Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodard et al v. Victory Records, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv07594
Plaintiff:
Joshua Woodard , Neil Westfall , Jeremy McKinnon and others
Defendant:
Victory Records, Inc. and Another Victory, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woodard et al v. Victory Records, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00510
Plaintiff:
Joshua Woodard , Neil Westfall , Jeremy McKinnon and others
Defendant:
Victory Records, Inc. and Another Victory, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHELNUT et al v. A.P. SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv87778
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. SHELNUT and PHYLLIS SHELNUT
Defendant:
A.P. SERVICES, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SHELNUT et al v. A.P. SERVICES, INC. et al
as PAE/2:09-CV-87778
Plaintiff:
SHELNUT
Defendant:
A.P. SERVICES, INC
SHELNUT v. PAIGE et al
as 1:2009cv00356
Plaintiff:
MARK SLATE SHELNUT
Defendant:
GREGORY STEVEN PAIGE and SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Shelnut v. Paige et al
as 5:2009cv00050
Plaintiff:
Mark Slate Shelnut
Defendant:
Gregory Steven Paige and Swift Transportation Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
