Cases 1 - 10 of 465
Aldo DiBelardino v. Jason Miyares
as 24-1269
Plaintiff:
ALDO DIBELARDINO
Defendant:
JASON S. MIYARES, Virginia Attorney General, PETER VINCENT CHIUSANO, MARK S. SMITH and others
Runkle v. State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1122
Plaintiff:
AMY M. RUNKLE
Defendant:
STATE OF COLORADO, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, MICHAEL MARTINEZ, Former Chief Judge and others
LaPlante v. City of Muskego et al
as 2:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
John R LaPlante
Defendant:
City of Muskego, Samuel Weinkauf, Shawn Diedrich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bedwell v. K&B Transport, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
William R. Bedwell
Defendant:
K&B Transport, Inc., William Shockley and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Simpson v. 3M Company
as 2:2024cv00396
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Roderick Simpson, Tracy Alan Read, Lakeshia Reaggins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Houston v. Golden Entertainment, et al.
as 24-95
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Defendant / Appellee:
GOLDEN ENTERTAINMENT, STATE OF NEVADA, DIANNE FERRANTE and others
Simpson v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv01720
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc., UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Roderick Simpson, Tracy Alan Read, Lakeshia Reaggins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wysonia Shockley v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv05689
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Wysonia Shockley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jermaine ShockleyIn re: Jermaine Shockley
as 23-2959
Petitioner:
In re: JERMAINE SHOCKLEY
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
