Cases 31 - 40 of 725
Varney v. Sizemore, Inc. DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. SEE CASE # 5:23-CV-361-D-RJ
as 4:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
Brant Varney
Defendant:
Sizemore, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Varney v. Sizemore, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00361
Plaintiff:
Brant Varney
Defendant:
Sizemore, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
SIZEMORE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16813
Plaintiff:
KENNEDY SIZEMORE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Couch v. Clay County Detention Center et al
as 6:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Couch
Defendant:
Clay County Detention Center, Linda Smallwood, Redemption Road Recovery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. HOOKS
as 4:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B BROWN and MASON B BROWN
Defendant:
ROBERT HOOKS, KERTAVIOUS COPPINS, AARON GUILLAUME and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sizemore v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv01557
Plaintiff:
Christie Sizemore
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Jane Doe v. James Dewees
as 23-1550
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES T. DEWEES, Sheriff of Carroll County, BEN CRAFT, Deputy Sheriff, DOUGLAS KRIETE, Deputy Sheriff and others
OGILVIE v. FAYETTE COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2023cv00900
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MICHAEL OGILVIE
Defendant:
FAYETTE COUNTY JAIL, THOMAS ELLIS, GLEN SIZEMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Asmer v. Ms. Walton-Battle
as 23-6443
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES ANTHONY ASMER
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. WALTON-BATTLE, H. LOPEZ and WALTER VEREEN
Defendant:
REX BLOCKER, STEPHEN SIZEMORE, KRISTEN ELDRED and others
SIZEMORE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08468
Plaintiff:
DANIEL RAY SIZEMORE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
