Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Doe et al v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2026cv03980
Plaintiff:
Jane A.A.4625 Doe, Jane E.H.0597 Doe, John M.H.6154 Doe and others
Defendant:
County of San Diego, Officer Martinez, Officer Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Giles et al v. Rawlings Sporting Goods Company Inc
as 2:2026cv02395
Plaintiff:
Ashley Giles and Kevin Snider
Defendant:
Rawlings Sporting Goods Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Ayers v. Sampson et al
as 3:2026cv05717
Plaintiff:
Lenier Ayers
Defendant:
Colette Sampson, Hailey Donovan, Alex McKenna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Snider v. Howard et al
as 2:2026cv11879
Plaintiff:
Joshua Snider
Defendant:
Howard, Kinner, Shawn MacLean and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Snider v. Davis
as 2:2026cv11880
Plaintiff:
Joshua Snider
Defendant:
Walt Davis
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Snider v. Howard et al
as 2:2026cv11881
Plaintiff:
Joshua Snider
Defendant:
Howard, McClain, Harvey and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Snider (PS) v. El Paso County Jail et al
as 1:2026cv02326
Plaintiff:
Robert Wayne Snider
Defendant:
El Paso County Jail, Criminal Justice Detention Center and Payton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snider et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv04009
Plaintiff:
Collin Snider
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Snider v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2026cv02989
Plaintiff:
Gary David Snider
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
