Cases 1 - 10 of 79
John Doe, et al v. Dana Nessel, et al
as 23-2097
Plaintiff:
TIM BROWN, JOHN DOE and TIMOTHY RONALD BROWN
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DANA NESSEL, ANICA LETICA, ONE COURT OF JUSTICE, Judges and others
Sova v. Reliastar Life Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv06146
Plaintiff:
Audrey Sova
Defendant:
Reliastar Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Doe et al v. Nessel et al
as 1:2023cv11655
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Tim Brown
Defendant:
Dana Nessel, Anica Letica, One Court of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sova v. A & D Charitable Foundation, Inc
as 1:2023cv11571
Plaintiff:
Patricia Sova
Defendant:
A & D Charitable Foundation, Inc., d/b/a Great Lakes Pace and A & D Charitable Foundation, Inc Doing business as Great Lakes Pace
SOVA v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv01051
Plaintiff:
BONITA MICHELLE SOVA
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - SOCIAL SECURITY NOTICING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
United States of America v. Sova
as 1:2022cv00658
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
David D. Sova
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sova et al v. Snyder et al
as 2:2022cv00247
Plaintiff:
Christopher P. Sova and Kristi Sova
Defendant:
Ronald H. Snyder, Benefits for Corporate America, Benefit Strategies Group and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Grizely v. Behof et al
as 3:2021cv50216
Plaintiff:
Jason S. Grizely
Defendant:
Richard Behof, Keith Sova and Rotes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
