Cases 1 - 10 of 266
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kent G. Lehman v. FCC et al
as 8:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Kent G. Lehman
Defendant:
FCC, T-Mobile, AT and T and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Strege v. Gmail-Google, et al
as 24-2012
Plaintiff:
ADAM STREGE
Defendant:
GMAIL-GOOGLE, NEWFOLD DIGITAL, 80 Website Hosting Companies, SPAM TITAN, Titanhq.com and others
Edwin Rojas, et al v. State of Connecticut, et al
as 23-7179
Plaintiff:
Edwin L. Rojas, Former U.S. House Representative, California 7th District, Chairman of Plan B Network Services and Plan B Network Services, Inc.
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, State of Texas, State of California and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00778
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Simmons v. Corewell Health
as 1:2023cv01123
Defendant:
Corewell Health and Spectrum Health System
Plaintiff:
Abigail Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
ROJAS et al v. STATE OF CONNECTICUT et al
as 1:2023cv03140
Plaintiff:
EDWIN L. ROJAS and PLAN B NETWORK SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
