Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Lee v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Stacy Lee
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Stringfellow v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04059
Plaintiff:
Stacy Lee Stringfellow
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Satzman v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv01859
Petitioner:
Stacy Lee Satzman
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC et al v. Lee et al
as 2:2020cv01336
Plaintiff:
Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC and BR IP Holder LLC
Defendant:
Stacie Lee and Si-Chul Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PARRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv88911
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STACY LEE PARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Santina Nguyen v. Westside Ventures, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01142
Defendant:
WESTSIDE VENTURES, INC. DBA SKIN GENTLEMENS CLUB, Doe Managers 1-3, Does 4-10 and others
Plaintiff:
SANTINA NGUYEN, Sophia Heidler, Ida Hurley and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Teixeira v. United States of America
as 4:2020cv00019
Petitioner:
Stacy Lee Teixeira
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lee et al v. Webb Road Maintenance Group et al
as 3:2019cv05889
Defendant:
Webb Road Maintenance Group and William Macaras
Plaintiff:
John Lee and Stacie Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Paladin Water Technology, Inc. et al v. Peters
as 1:2019cv00721
Plaintiff:
AWG Contracting LLC and Paladin Water Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
Stacy Lee Peters
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Hale v. Berryhill
as 4:2019cv00412
Plaintiff:
Stacy Lee Hale
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
