Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Nelson v Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Stacy Nelson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
NELSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv03016
Plaintiff:
STACY NELSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moffett v. Hardeman County et al
as 1:2022cv01045
Plaintiff:
Cameron Moffett
Defendant:
Hardeman County, Hardeman County Correctional Facilities Corporation, CoreCivic Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NELSON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv10526
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
STACY NELSON
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Oates v. Saul
as 3:2019cv00448
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul and Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Stacy Nelson Oates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Oates v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv00726
Plaintiff:
Stacy Nelson Oates
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Nelson v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv06384
Plaintiff:
Stacie Nelson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jeffrey Walker v. Jones, et al
as 11-15057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY E. WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
JONES, Officer, ASUCION BENDEBEL, STACY NELSON and others
Nelson et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2010cv03020
Plaintiff:
Stacy Nelson , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
