Cases 41 - 50 of 409
Brooke Henderson, et al v. Springfield R-12 School District, et al
as 23-1880
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brooke Henderson and Jennifer Lumley
Defendant / Appellee:
Springfield R-12 School District, Board of Education, of the Springfield R-12 School District, Grenita Lathan and others
Defendant:
Martha Doenning
Appellant:
Americans for Prosperity Foundation, Alliance Defending Freedom, Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression and others
State of Iowa, et al v. EPA, et al
as 23-1144
Petitioner:
State of Iowa, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Torkelsen v. State of North Dakota
as 1:2023cv00084
Petitioner:
Steven A. Torkelsen
Respondent:
State of North Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alliance Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA
as 23-10362
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Janet Woodcock, M.D., in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration and others
Intervenor:
Danco Laboratories, L.L.C.
Amicus Curiae:
State of New York, Ethics and Public Policy Center, Local Governments and others
Not Classified By Court:
240 Members of Congress and Human Coalition
Federal Trade Commission v. Meta Platforms Inc., et al
as 5:2022cv04325
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc.,, Within Unlimited, Inc., Mark Zuckerberg and others
Interested Party:
Apple Inc., Alphabet Inc., Nike, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of New York, State of Alaska, State of California and others
Not Classified By Court:
ByteDance Inc., Valve Corporation, HTC America, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Forte Nexus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
United States of America et al v. MPLX, LP
as 2:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
United States of America, State of North Dakota and State of Wyoming
Defendant:
MPLX, LP
GenBioPro, Inc. v. Sorsaia et al
as 3:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
GenBioPro, Inc.
Defendant:
Mark A. Sorsaia, Patrick Morrissey and Patrick Morrisey
Amicus Curiae:
The State of Alabama, The State of Arkansas, The State of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
State of Utah et al v. Walsh et al
as 2:2023cv00016
Not Classified By Court:
State of Iowa
Plaintiff:
State of Utah, State of Texas, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Defendant:
Martin Walsh, Secretary of Labor, U. S. Department of Labor and Martin J Walsh
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of North Dakota v. United States Department of Interior, The et al
as 1:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
State of North Dakota
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior, The, Debra Ann Haaland, Bureau of Land Management, The and others
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181 Environment: Review of Agency Action
Access Independent Health Services, Inc., et al v. Birch Burdick, et al
as 22-3595
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MKB Management Corp., doing business as Red River Women's Clinic, Kathryn L. Eggleston, M.D. and Access Independent Health Services, Inc., doing business as Red River Women's Clinic
Defendant:
Birch Burdick, in his official capacity as State Attorney for Cass County, Larry Johnson, M.D. in his official capacity as a member of the North Dakota Board of Medical Examiners, Robert Tanous, D.O. in his official capacity as a member of the North Dakota Board of Medical Examiners and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Drew Howard Wrigley, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of North Dakota, et al.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
