Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Byers v. PV Holding Corp. et al
as 8:2022cv02386
Plaintiff:
MIchelle Byers
Defendant:
PV Holding Corp., Avis Budget Group, Inc., Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Minnesota Life Insurance Company v. Estate of Molly R. Stacey et al
as 8:2021cv00015
Defendant:
Austin J. Stacey, Mark A. Meyer, Courtney R. Stacey and others
Plaintiff:
Minnesota Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Adrian Rangel v. Steven Meyer, et al
as 19-3472
Defendant / Appellee:
VALERIE CHURCH, STEVEN P. MEYER and MATTHEW D. BONLAC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADRIAN G. RANGEL
Blake v. LEGEND SECURITIES, INC., et al
as 9:2019cv80891
Respondent:
LEGEND SECURITIES, INC.,, BRIAN KEITH DECKER, STEVEN JOHN MEYER and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Blake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCaster v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2018cv01043
Defendant:
Steven P Meyer and Indiana State of
Plaintiff:
Antonio D McCaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rangel v. Meyer et al
as 2:2018cv00413
Defendant:
Steven P Meyer, Valerie Church and Matthew D Boulac
Plaintiff:
Adrian G Rangel
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
MEYER v. CACH, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01040
Defendant:
CACH, LLC and J.A. CAMBECE LAW OFFICE, P.C.
Plaintiff:
STEVEN M. MEYER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sean Harris v. Akorn, Inc., et al
as 1:2017cv05021
Plaintiff:
Sean Harris
Defendant:
Akorn, Inc. , John N. Kapoor , Ronald M. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Robert Berg v. Akorn, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv05016
Plaintiff:
Robert Berg
Defendant:
Akorn, Inc. , John N. Kapoor , Kenneth S. Abramowitz and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Jorge Alcarez v. Akorn, Inc., et al
as 1:2017cv05017
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alcarez
Defendant:
Akorn, Inc. , Kenneth S. Abramowitz , Adrienne L. Graves and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
