Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Roberts v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2019cv01836
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Plaintiff:
Steven L Roberts
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
David Tijerina v. Reginaldo Stanley, et al
as 19-40364
Defendant / Appellee:
REGINALDO F. STANLEY, Medical Provider at Telford Unit, PAMELA PACE, Practice Manager at Coffield Unit, STEVEN L. ROBERTS, Medical Provider at Telford Unit and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID TIJERINA
Maldonado v. Brock et al
as 5:2017cv00157
Plaintiff:
Phillip Maldonado
Defendant:
Jerry L Brock, Chadrick S Clark, Joseph W Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven Roberts v. United State
as 16-4292
Petitioner - Appellant:
Steven L. Roberts
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Tijerina v. Stanley et al
as 5:2016cv00102
Plaintiff:
David Tijerina
Defendant:
Reginaldo F Stanley, Jammie L Barker, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2016cv02451
Plaintiff:
Steven L Roberts
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Roberts v. USA
as 4:2016cv00564
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Steven L Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Steven L. Roberts v. Philomena Roberts et al
as 1:2011cv00414
Plaintiff:
Steven L. Roberts
Defendant:
Philomena Roberts and Fred Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steven L. Roberts v. Philomena Roberts et al
as 2:2010cv09427
Defendant:
Fred Roberts and Philomena Roberts
Plaintiff:
Steven L. Roberts
Steven Roberts, et al v. Jack Mentzer, et al
as 09-3251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN L. ROBERTS, SHANE DEARDORFF, MATTHEW T. SHUEY and others
Plaintiff:
GORDON J. BERLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK F. MENTZER, JOSEPH M. DITZLER and BOROUGH OF ELIZABETH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
