Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 983
USA v. Bashiek Stovall
as 24-1717
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: BASHIEK STOVALL
Stovall v. Warden of SCI-Muncy et al
as 2:2024cv01839
Petitioner: ARCELIA TRUMAINE STOVALL
Respondent: Warden of SCI-Muncy and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bracken v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00586
Plaintiff: Garvester Bracken
Defendant: State of Missouri, Calea Stovall-Reid and Joan L. Moriarty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STOVALL v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00146
Plaintiff: DANIEL C. STOVALL
Defendant: VANIHEL and WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STOVALL v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00144
Plaintiff: DANIEL C. STOVALL
Defendant: VANIHEL, BOBBIE RIGGS, BURD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leodis Randle v. Eric Higgins, et al
as 24-1711
Plaintiff: Leodis Randle
Defendant: Eric Higgins, Does, Agents, Dyer, 12th Street Police Officer, Major and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00371
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Stovall v. Henry
as 6:2024cv06035
Plaintiff: Vandy D. Stovall and Black
Defendant: Dr Guy Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STOVALL v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv03705
Defendant: LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff: CHERYL STOVALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stovall v. Warden of SCI-Muncy et al
as 1:2024cv00343
Petitioner: Arcelia Trumaine Stovall
Respondent: Warden of SCI-Muncy and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?