Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Howard Carter v. Kathleen Kane, et al
as 16-3731
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant:
KATHLEEN KANE, BRIAN COLEMAN, DARRELL O. DUGAN and others
Howard Carter v. Kathleen Kane, et al
as 16-3731
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN G. KANE, BRIAN COLEMAN, DARRELL O. DUGAN and others
CARTER v. KANE et al
as 1:2016cv00007
Plaintiff:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant:
KATHLEEN G. KANE, BRIAN COLEMEN, DARRELL O. DUGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berry v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv09859
Plaintiff:
Donna Sue Berry
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SMITH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv00088
Plaintiff:
JAMIL SMITH
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, BRIAN V. COLEMAN, R. MACKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERRY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2013cv32616
Plaintiff:
Connie Sue Berry
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon Women's Health & Urology , Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BERRY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as PAE/2:13-cv-04961
Plaintiff:
CONNIE SUE BERRY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLOGY , ETHICON, INC. and others
BERRY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2013cv04961
Plaintiff:
CONNIE SUE BERRY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLOGY , ETHICON, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Berry et al v. Bayer CropScience LP et al
as 4:2011cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jason Berry , Marta Berry , Lloyd Mark Berry and others
Defendant:
Bayer CropScience LP , Bayer CropScience Inc , Bayer CropScience Holding Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Berry et al v. Bayer CropScience LP et al
as 5:2010cv00378
Plaintiff:
Jason Berry , Marta Berry , Lloyd Mark Berry and others
Defendant:
Bayer CropScience LP , Bayer CropScience Inc , Bayer CropScience Holding Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
