Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Nealson v. Blankenship, et al
as 7:2023cv00071
Petitioner:
Christian Thomas Nealson
Defendant:
T. Blankenship, T. Norvell, C.A. Dye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nealson v. Blankenship, et al
as 2:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Christian Thomas Nealson
Defendant:
T. Norvell, C.A. Dye, Lt. Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Rife et al
as 1:2021cv00424
Plaintiff:
Adrian Bailey
Defendant:
M. Rife, C. Maruka, E. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Erlenbach v. Yavapai County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2019cv08281
Plaintiff:
Chuck C Erlenbach and Treebrook
Defendant:
Yavapai County Sheriff's Office, K Crockett, K Danford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Erlenbach v. Martin et al
as 3:2019cv08229
Plaintiff:
Chuck C Erlenbach and Treebrook
Defendant:
Travis Blankenship, Blake Lanove, Unknown Hearl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLANKENSHIP et al v. DILLARD et al
as 1:2010cv00717
Plaintiff:
HOWARD BLANKENSHIP and MARY T. BLANKENSHIP
Defendant:
SAMUEL R. CATES, JR., MARK S. DILLARD, FEDEX FREIGHT EAST, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
In re: Robert McClean
as 10-8013
Debtor:
In re: ROBERT W. MCLEAN
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT H. WALDSCHMIDT
Defendant - Appellant:
WAYNE ALLEN, JOHN T. BLANKENSHIP, THE HERZER REVOCABLE TRUST and others
Murray v. McGhee et al
as 6:2009cv06062
Plaintiff:
Matthew Murray
Defendant:
McGhee, McDermott, Voss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. McGhee et al
as 4:2009cv00495
Plaintiff:
Matthew Murray
Defendant:
McGhee, McDermott, Voss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. McGhee et al
as 4:2009cv00496
Plaintiff:
Matthew Murray
Defendant:
McGhee, McDermott, Voss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
