Cases 1 - 10 of 35
USA v. Myelicia Rodgers
as 24-10638
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MYELICIA T. RODGERS
Beretervide v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail et al
as 3:2022cv00490
Plaintiff:
Derrick Beretervide
Defendant:
Hampton Roads Regional Jail, Sergeant Mooney, T Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad Abdullah v. Vergakis et al
as 1:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Shamsiddin Muhammad Abdullah
Defendant:
Col. J. Vergakis, Cpt. Robbins, Major Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Briggs v. Rodgers et al
as 2:2021cv02140
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Briggs
Defendant:
Matthew Rodgers, Jody T Rodger and The Jody T. Rodgers Revocable Trust dated December 13, 2013
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Howell v. Department of Justice Services
as 4:2021cv01000
Plaintiff:
Alexander Howell
Defendant:
Department of Justice Services, Officer M Lee, L. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00018
Plaintiff:
Taywan Dewayne Campbell
Defendant:
Ventress Correctional Facility, Alabama Department of Corrections, T. Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillenwater v. Suko et al
as 2:2018cv00263
Defendant:
Lonny R Suko, Joseph H Harrington, John T Rodgers and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Gillenwater
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillenwater v. Suko et al
as 1:2018cv05302
Defendant:
Lonny R Suko, Joseph H Harrington, John T Rodgers and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Gillenwater
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanson v. Paramo et al
as 3:2017cv01335
Plaintiff:
Dennis Hanson
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo, C. Jamerson, T. Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillenwater v. Suko et al
as 2:2017cv00215
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Gillenwater
Defendant:
Lonny R Suko, Rosanna Malouf Peterson, John T Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
