Cases 1 - 10 of 698
Palmer v. Williams
as 2:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Amanda Terecia Palmer
Defendant:
Venecia T Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALKHATIB v. RICHARDS et al
as 3:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
LATIF ALKHATIB
Defendant:
M. RICHARDS, E. BROWN, R. WESTOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
David Atkins, Jr. v. Doctor Shamar
as 24-6352
Plaintiff:
DAVID ATKINS, JR.
Defendant:
DOCTOR SHAMAR, Facility Doctor, NURSE STITH, RN, MS. OSEGHALE, Food Service Supervisor and others
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN MILLER
Cardwell v. Roundtree et al
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Duval F. Cardwell
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard Roundtree, Major Mitchell, Major Rawlings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Lakeland Police Department
as 8:2024cv00631
Plaintiff:
Terrance T. Williams
Defendant:
Lakeland Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALLACE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WALLACE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HARRY, L. HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Bishop et al
as 8:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Xavier T. Williams
Defendant:
Michael B. Bishop, Marcus J. Bailey, Steven D. Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Watson et al
as 2:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Corey T. Williams
Defendant:
Mr. D. Watson and Mr. J.D. Oates III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CORDERO ESPINOZA v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2024cv00542
Plaintiff:
PRESLEY STEVEN CORDERO ESPINOZA
Defendant:
JAMAD T. WILLIAMS and UNITED STATE POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Walsh v. Tristan et al
as 2:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Robert Walsh
Defendant:
David Tristan, Glenda Stewart, Moka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
