Cases 1 - 10 of 711
Wade v Cobble et al
as 1:2024cv08142
Defendant:
Vanellis, Howard, Meller and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Lee Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Weber, et al.
as 24-4973
Defendant:
ASHLEY COLEMAN, CARL R. WEBER, JAQUAVIS COLEMAN and others
Plaintiff:
TYSHAWN T. WILLIAMS
Mark Williams v. Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department, et al
as 24-2404
Defendant:
K9 OFFICER, (John Doe) (Handler), INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and others
Plaintiff:
MARK T. WILLIAMS
Williams v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00298
Petitioner:
Terrance T. Williams
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv02502
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Terrance T. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Henning et al
as 3:2024cv00384
Defendant:
John T. Williams and Jordan M. Henning
Plaintiff:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Williams v. Harmon Badge 0156 et al
as 8:2024cv01851
Plaintiff:
Beneficiary to Angela T Williams
Defendant:
Harmon Badge 0156, Cedric Heyward, McDonald's Tow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Moon v. Williams et al
as 1:2024cv02761
Defendant:
MJJ Productions, Jive/Zomba Group, Wayne T. Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Juliette Moon
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
Bellamy (ID 53454) v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv03102
Defendant:
(fnu) Stevens, Aramark Corporation, T. Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Allen Bellamy, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04627
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
