Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Lewis et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 4:2023cv00048
Plaintiff: Janet S. Lewis and Jennifer Kahl
Defendant: Paramount Global, Tate Andale, LLC, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Lewis, et al. v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., et al.
as 4:2022cv00076
Plaintiff: Tommy Lewis and Janet S. Lewis
Defendant: AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, successor by merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., A.W. Chesterton Company, Cummins Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1564
Plaintiff / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Rushton v. AW Chesterton Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00500
Defendant: Tate Andale LLC, Trane US Inc a Delaware Corporation with its principal place of business in the State of North Carolina formerly known as American Standard Inc doing business as American Standard Products Inc., ViacomCBS Inc and others
Plaintiff: Martha Rushton and Glen O Rushton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Pelton et al v. John Crane, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv04316
Plaintiff: Chloyde Pelton, Shirley Pelton and Crown, Cork and Seal Company, Inc., successor-in-interest to Mundet Cork Company
Cross Defendant: John Crane, Inc., IMO Industries Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest to Delaval Turbine, Inc., and C.H. Wheeler Manufacturing Company and Goulds Pumps, LLC
Counter Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems, Inc., Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Carrier Corporaion, Carrier Global Corporation and others
Defendant: Alfa Laval Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest to Delaval Purifiers, Amtrol Inc., successor-in-interest to Thrush Company and H.A. Thrush Company, Caterpillar, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
WARRINGTON et al v. 3M COMPANY, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv03207
Plaintiff: ROBERT M. WARRINGTON, SR. and JOAN M. WARRINGTON
Defendant: 3M COMPANY,, ABB, INC.,, AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cross Defendant: HONEYWELL INC., CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. and JERGUSON GAGE & VALVE COMPANY
Cross Claimant: THE WILLIAM POWELL COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Lishman et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01570
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Inc Caterpillar, Crane Co. and others
Counter Defendant: Nash Engineering Co., Inc., Flowserve US Inc., Alfa Laval Inc. and others
Cross Defendant: Tate Andale, Inc., Velan Valve Corp., Honeywell International Inc. and others
Counter Claimant: John Crane Inc.
Plaintiff: Vicki Lishman
Cross Claimant: Grinnell LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Payne et al v. ABB, INC. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to BAILEY METER CO.) et al
as 2:2020at00569
Defendant: Foster Wheeler LLC, GOULDS PUMPS, INCORPORATED, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff: Susan Payne and Dennis C Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Payne et al v. ABB, Inc., et al., We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv01198
Defendant: Johnson Controls, Inc., Foster Wheeler LLC, Goulds Pumps, Incorporated and others
Plaintiff: Susan Payne and Dennis C. Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dennis C. Payne et al v. Abb, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01713
Defendant: YORK INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to FRICK COMPANY), VIAD CORP (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to GRISCOM RUSSELL COMPANY), AMERICAN COMPRESSOR COMPANY and others
Plaintiff: Susan Payne and Dennis C Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?