Cases 1 - 8 of 8
BROWN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv00095
Petitioner:
CHARLES LEON BROWN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TERRE HAUTE USP WARDEN, TERRE HAUTE USP SIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
WRIGHT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY STEVEN WRIGHT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and TERRE HAUTE USP WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jones v. BOP Director, The et al
as 1:2019cv00553
Plaintiff:
William Jones and William Lee Jones
Defendant:
BOP Director, The, Pollock USP, McCreary USP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. BOP Director, The et al
as 1:2019cv02118
Plaintiff:
William Jones and William Lee Jones
Defendant:
Beaumont USP, Pollock USP, McCreary USP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis Van Dyke v. Scott Slusser
as 15-6938
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAINT DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE, Pro Se Writer Attorney At Law Prophet Pastor Rabbi
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT SLUSSER, SEAN F. PERRIN, Attorney - Womble Carlyle Sandridge and Rice, ADRIAN W. DELLINGER and others
VAN DYKE PRO SE WRITER ATTORNEY AT LAW PROPHET PASTOR RABBI v. SLUSSER et al
as 1:2014cv00712
Plaintiff:
SAINT DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE PRO SE WRITER ATTORNEY AT LAW PROPHET PASTOR RABBI
Defendant:
SCOTT T. SLUSSER, SEAN PERRIN, ADRIAN W. DELLINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2014cv00578
Plaintiff:
PROPHET PREACHER PRO SE WRITER ATTORNEY AT LAW DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE
Defendant:
ROGER JAMES DAVIS, BRUSE BURGER, CHARLES VANCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrew Gross, III v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 11-5262
Petitioner - Appellant:
Andrew Gross
Respondent - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the U.S., Harley G. Lappin, Bureau of Prisons Director and Charles L. Lockett, Warden, Terre Haute USP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
