Cases 1 - 10 of 17
ELLIOTT et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01741
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ELLIOTT, ANTWAIN JONES, ANTHONY STEWART and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, MAGGIE BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STOKES v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2023cv00675
Plaintiff:
THOMAS STOKES
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER JR., DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00195
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokes v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv00594
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Thomas Stokes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abiodun et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 3:2017cv05070
Plaintiff:
Olufemi Abiodun , Arturo Barraza , Liliana Barreda and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stuart et al
as 1:2017cv00107
Plaintiff:
Frank Stuart , Jason Adams , Michael Barnes and others
Defendant:
Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Abiodun et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as TXW/1:17-cv-00760
Plaintiff:
Olufemi Abiodun , Arturo Barraza , Liliana Barreda and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Abiodun et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00760
Plaintiff:
Olufemi Abiodun, Arturo Barraza, Liliana Barreda and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
USA v. John-Thomas Stokes
as 16-15104
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN-THOMAS STOKES
Stokes v. Metalcraft of Mayville, Inc.
as 8:2016cv01553
Plaintiff:
Thomas Stokes
Defendant:
Metalcraft of Mayville, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
