Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Hubbard v. United States of America Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2023cv00832
Petitioner:
Marc Hubbard
Respondent:
United States of America Bureau of Prisons and Timothy Barnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hill v. Ciolli
as 1:2023cv02539
Plaintiff:
David E. Hill
Defendant:
A. Ciolli, Andre Matevousian and Timothy Barnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARNETT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv52829
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY BARNETT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARNETT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv22398
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY BARNETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Wilmont Barnett
as 17-13234
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILMONT TIMOTHY BARNETT
Doe v. Barnett et al
as 1:2016cv02084
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Timothy Barnett, John Caraway, Angela Dunbar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robert Bry v. City of Frontenac, et al
as 16-1202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert M. Bry
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Frontenac, Missouri, Jeremy Newton, James Ford and others
Movant - Appellee:
Megan Julian
BARNETT v. SMITH
as 2:2015cv00226
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY BARNETT
Respondent:
BRIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bry v. City of Frontenac, Missouri et al
as 4:2014cv01501
Plaintiff:
Robert M Bry
Defendant:
City of Frontenac, Missouri, Chris Lo, Matthew Brune and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PEAR et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv01025
Plaintiff:
DAVE PEAR , HEIDI PEAR , LEONARD MARSHALL and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE , NFL PROPERTIES , RIDDELL INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
