Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Tiekert v. Village of Mamaroneck et al
as 7:2023cv08714
Plaintiff:
Stuart Tiekert
Defendant:
Village of Mamaroneck, Tom Murphy, Charlotte Mountain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Andrews v. Murphy et al
as 1:2023cv00950
Plaintiff:
Dessie Maria Andrews
Defendant:
Tom Murphy, Amy Clark Meachum, Suzanne Covington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00973
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Murphy v. Amazon.Com, Inc., et al.
as 1:2019cv01577
Defendant:
USX Logistics, Amazon.Com, Inc. and US Xpress
Plaintiff:
Tom Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Murphy v. Amazon.Com, Inc.
as 1:2019at00806
Plaintiff:
Tom Murphy
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jay Thomas v. Ramapo College of New Jersey, et al
as 17-3532
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAY L. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
RAMAPO COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY, A body corporate of the State of New Jersey, DR. PAMELA BISCHOFF, the former Vice President of Student Affairs in her Individual Capacity, IVY PAYNE, In her official and individual capacity and others
Murphy et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02267
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Murphy and Tom Murphy
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Andrew Kalick v. USA, et al
as 14-3542
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW P. KALICK
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and others
KALICK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2013cv06456
Plaintiff:
ANDREW P. KALICK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS, ERIC SHINSEKI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-15955
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
