Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Alemar v. Reichert, et al
as 20-1432
Defendant / Appellee:
TABATA, Nurse and DOCTOR BRYAN REICHERT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE ALEMAR
Alemar v. Reichert et al
as 1:2020cv02855
Defendant:
Tabzte, Bryan Reichert and Tabata
Plaintiff:
Jose Alemar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kotoe Asami v. Tabata Oxford Personnel LLC et al
as 2:2020cv06015
Defendant:
Does 1 through 20, inclusive and Tabata Oxford Personnel LLC
Plaintiff:
Kotoe Asami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Underwater Alert System LLC v. Tabata Co., Ltd. d/b/a TUSA
as 1:2015cv10758
Plaintiff:
Underwater Alert System LLC
Defendant:
Tabata Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Megumi Doi et al v. MAMORU SAITO, et al.
as 2:2014mc00312
Plaintiff:
HITOSHI KAWAMOTO, TAKAHISA SUZUKI, ATSUSHI MORI and others
Defendant:
EUBK HOLDINGS, INC., MAMORU SAITO, AMIWORLD, INC. and others
Tabata USA, Inc. v Quick,et al
as 1:2012cv00284
Garnishee:
United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Tabata USA, Inc.
Defendant:
James L Quick, Jr. and Brenda K Quick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Cuevas v. Pereira
as 1:2010cv12277
Plaintiff:
Felix L. Cuevas
Defendant:
Amalia Tabata Pereira
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cuevas et al v. McKeever et al
as 8:2010cv02544
Plaintiff:
Felix Luis Cuevas and Amalia Tabata Pereira
Defendant:
Michael McKeever, Geogymon George and Julianne M. Holt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Flashpoint Technology Inc. v. Aiptek Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00106
Plaintiff:
Flashpoint Technology Inc.
Defendant:
Aiptek Inc., Argus Camera Co. LLC, Bushnell Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tazoe et al v. Airbus S.A.S.
as 1:2008cv23434
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Airbus S.A.S.
Plaintiff:
Giselle Garcia, Evandro Santos, Lidia Mancia and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Empresa Brasileira de Infra-Estrutura Aeroportuaria and Tam Linhas Aereas, S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
