Cases 11 - 20 of 328
Hicks, III v. Alexander et al
as 1:2023cv01070
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Hicks, III
Defendant:
Jonny Alexander and Ryan Burlesci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TETTERTON v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2023cv01394
Petitioner:
TERRY LEE TETTERTON
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nida v. Martin et al
as 2:2023cv14030
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Nida
Defendant:
Martin and Corizon Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry Branson v. Emily Johnson Piper, et al
as 23-1160
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Terry Lee Branson
Defendant / Appellee:
Emily Johnson Piper, in their official and individual capacity, Nancy Johnston, in their official and individual capacity, Shelby Richardson, in their official and individual capacity and others
Froman v. Shoop
as 2:2023cv00444
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Froman
Defendant:
Warden Tim Shoop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CRISS JR v. DURANT et al
as 1:2022cv02162
Petitioner:
TERRY LEE CRISS JR
Respondent:
DAVE DURANT and DANA PARKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shafer v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00056
Petitioner:
Terry Lee Shafer
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shafer v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv03505
Petitioner:
Terry Lee Shafer
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Segers et al
as 1:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Davis
Defendant:
Dan Segers and Carl Hefner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lanham v. Alexander et al
as 1:2022cv01184
Plaintiff:
Perry Brent Lanham
Defendant:
Johnny Alexander, Brent Booth, Terry Lee Dicus, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
