Cases 11 - 20 of 440
MCNIEL et al v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv16888
Plaintiff:
THEO MCNIEL and THE ESTATE OF BETTY SUE MCNIEL
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
M., et al v. Beacon Health Options, et al
as 23-4112
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THEO M. and M. M.
Defendant / Appellant:
BEACON HEALTH OPTIONS, INC. and CHEVRON CORPORATION MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE PLAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CERIGO et al v. MCKENNA et al
as 2:2023cv04311
Plaintiff:
THEO CERIGO and NANCY SMITH
Defendant:
CASSEY MCKENNA, GABRIEL MOREANO, EUGENE LUGTU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Will County et al
as 1:2023cv04879
Plaintiff:
Terrence T Williams
Defendant:
Will County, Vincent L. Perillo, Michelle Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis et al v. Theo Chocolate Inc
as 2:2023cv01096
Plaintiff:
Rockime Davis and MyHang Le
Defendant:
Theo Chocolate Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sobotka v. Theo Chocolate, Inc.
as 2:2023cv05474
Plaintiff:
Marta Sobotka
Defendant:
Theo Chocolate, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Quiroz et al v. City of Dayton et al
as 1:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Madelyn Marina Quiroz and Marina Naomi Hernandez Quiroz
Defendant:
Eduardo Hernandez, City of Dayton, Theo Melancon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Theo Overstreet et al v. Abbott Cardiovascular Sys Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv01321
Plaintiff:
Theo Overstreet
Defendant:
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems Inc. (erroneously sued herein as "Abbott Cardiovascular Sys Inc.", Abbott Cardiovascular Sys Inc. and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
OKO International Co. v. Auffret Paris et al
as 0:2023cv61232
Plaintiff:
OKO INTERNATIONAL CO. d/b/a ARAGON, a Florida corporation and Oko International Co. a Florida corporation doing business as ARAGON
Defendant:
Auffret Paris, Argon Paris dba Argon Watches, Theo Auffret and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
