Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Webb v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 5:2015cv00013
Plaintiff:
Thomas H. Webb
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Syngenta Seeds, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Webb et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 5:2015cv00012
Plaintiff:
Thomas H. Webb and Webb Farms, Inc.
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Syngenta Seeds, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1328
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WEBB v. ASTRUE
as 1:2013cv00179
Plaintiff:
THOMAS KENDALL WEBB, JR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Social Security (RSI)
Webb v. McDonald et al
as 8:2013cv00229
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Webb
Defendant:
HCA Nurse McDonald, Dr Pate, Warden McCall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
HANCOCK BANK v. WEBB DIVERSIFIED INC et al
as 4:2012cv00607
Plaintiff:
HANCOCK BANK
Defendant:
WEBB DIVERSIFIED INC , WEBB DIVERSIFIED LLC , WAYNE S WEBB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Dubose et al v. Parkview Savings Bank et al
as 5:2011cv06727
Plaintiff:
Steven Millard Dubose and Jeffrey Thomas Smith
Defendant:
Parkview Savings Bank, Thomas A Webb, Todd Rothbard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Webb
as 4:2009cv00324
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Thomas W Webb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
WEBB et al v. CROWN CORK AND SEAL COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv67457
Plaintiff:
THOMAS D. WEBB and CLEAH JANE WEBB
Defendant:
CROWN CORK AND SEAL COMPANY, FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION, GARLOCK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Webb v. Owens, et al
as 06-51422
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS H WEBB
Defendant - Appellee:
RISSIE OWENS, NANCY SWAN, EZIO LEITE and others
:
MARK ROBINSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
