Cases 31 - 40 of 216
White et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Co
as 6:2014cv02536
Plaintiff:
Jody White, Gregory W Albert, Patricia Albert and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
B.O.L.T. et al v. City of Rancho Cordova et al
as 2:2014cv01588
Plaintiff:
B.O.L.T. , Mark Temple , John Dalke and others
Defendant:
City of Rancho Cordova, County of Sacramento, Rancho Cordova Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
B.O.L.T. et al v. Rabe et al
as 2:2014at00849
Plaintiff:
B.O.L.T. , Mark Temple , John Dalke and others
Defendant:
Jeffrey Rabe , City of Rancho Cordova, County of Sacramento and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bishop v. Wexford Health Care et al
as 2:2014cv00467
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bishop
Defendant:
Wexford Health Care, Corizon Health Care, Lawrence Ende and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George Mitchell v. State of Washington, et al
as 13-36217
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE O. MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, KELLY CUNNINGHAM, Superintendent, SCC Superintendent and DR. THOMAS BELL
Bell et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv32743
Plaintiff:
Linda Bell and Kerry Thomas Bell
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. Bell et al
as 2:2013cv02374
Defendant:
Thomas Bell and Wexford Health Sources Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Leo M Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laprada v. Bell et al
as 2:2013cv02298
Defendant:
Thomas Bell, Richard Pratt, Jo Ann Badders and others
Plaintiff:
Gildardo Laprada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Na'im Abdul-Mateen v. Thomas Bell, et al
as 13-2479
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NA'IM A. ABDUL-MATEEN
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS BELL, Warden and JANE DOE, Nursing Staff
Kendall Roberts v. Thomas Bell
as 13-2407
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENDALL ROBERTS
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS BELL, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
