Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Timothy Robert Moyer et al v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
as 5:2023cv00998
Plaintiff:
Timothy Robert Moyer and Phyllis Rae Wright
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Roberts v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2023pq01717
Plaintiff:
Timothy Roberts
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROBERTS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01641
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ROBERTS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
US v. Timothy Gallion
as 22-4015
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TIMOTHY ROBERT GALLION
Diaz v. Phillips 66 Partners LP et al
as 1:2021cv11106
Plaintiff:
Leo Diaz
Defendant:
Phillips 66 Partners LP, Greg C. Garland, David Bairrington and others
OVERLY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv51796
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ROBERT OVERLY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jacqueline Tauscher v. Pamela Donison, et al
as 21-16441
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACQUELINE M. TAUSCHER, Mother of Minor Children Z.H. and A.H.
Defendant / Appellee:
PAMELA DONISON, ELIZABETH FELDMAN, GERALD PORTER and others
Defendant:
BRIAN SKOW
Higgins v. Catalyst Exhibits Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01021
Plaintiff:
Douglas W Higgins
Defendant:
Catalyst Exhibits Inc, Tru Services Group Inc, Timothy Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tompkins v. State of Wyoming et al
as 0:2021cv00078
Petitioner:
Timothy Robert Tompkins
Respondent:
State of Wyoming and Wyoming Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
