Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Norris v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00562
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC and Atrium Medical Corporation
Plaintiff:
Tina Norris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norris v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv01133
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC and Atrium Medical Corporation
Plaintiff:
Tina Norris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv01851
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
NUNEZ v. NORRIS et al
as 5:2019cv00408
Defendant:
WARDEN JANINE L. QUIGLEY, MATTHEW CORNELL, DAVID KOPE and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE ENRIQUE NUNEZ, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norris et al v. Bluestem Brands, Inc. et al
as 0:2016cv03954
Plaintiff:
Tina Norris , Wendy Loepp and Sally Michalak
Defendant:
Bluestem Brands, Inc. , Blair, LLC and Does
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Norris et al v. Mountain States Health Alliance et al
as 2:2012cv00415
Plaintiff:
Tina Norris , Melissa Blevins and April Yarber
Defendant:
Mountain States Health Alliance, Blue Ridge Medical Management Corporation, Joseph Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Norris v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv04759
Plaintiff:
Tina Norris
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Gynecare, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norris v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv03518
Plaintiff:
Tina Norris
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Gynecare, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Paul Norris v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01349
Plaintiff:
Paul Norris and Tina Norris
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Paul Norris v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02549
Defendant:
DePuy International Limited, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Depuy, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Norris and Tina Norris
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
