Cases 1 - 10 of 15
ROGERS v. ACTION LAB ENTERTAINMENT et al
as 2:2023cv01248
Plaintiff:
TOM ROGERS
Defendant:
ACTION LAB ENTERTAINMENT and BRYAN SEATON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Rogers v. Action Lab Entertainment et al
as 1:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
Tom Rogers
Defendant:
Action Lab Entertainment and Bryan Seaton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Mitchell Harris v. Kent England
as 21-1150
Defendant / Appellee:
KEISHA MCCANTS, Paralegal Assistant, DR. AMBAR MATTA, General Surgeon, JAMES SPENCER, Store & Department Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MITCHELL HARRIS
Harris v. England et al
as 1:2020cv01509
Defendant:
Kent England, Keisha McCants, Sadia U. Rahman and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchell L. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Stuntz v. Lion Elastomers, L.L.C., et al
as 19-40657
Defendant / Appellee:
TRUDY LORD, HOWARD SCOTT HARDEGREE, TOM ROGERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DAVID STUNTZ
Rawlings et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00452
Plaintiff:
John Stanford, Daniel Walker, Sandra Rivero and others
Defendant:
Robert Bosch GmbH, Robert Bosch LLC, VM Motori S.p.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Rawlings et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00070
Plaintiff:
John Stanford, Daniel Walker, Sandra Rivero and others
Defendant:
VM Motori SpA, VM North America Inc, Robert Bosch GmbH and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Rogers et al v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
as 5:2018cv02197
Plaintiff:
Loni Laws Rogers and Tom Rogers
Defendant:
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stuntz v. Lion Elastomers LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00033
Plaintiff:
Michael David Stuntz
Defendant:
Lion Elastomers LLC , Howard Scott Hardegree , Trudy Lord and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Klein v. TiVo, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv04503
Plaintiff:
Melvyn Klein
Defendant:
TiVo, Inc., Peter Aquino, William Cella and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
