Cases 1 - 10 of 17
JOHNSON et al v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2023cv01938
Plaintiff:
BURL JOHNSON, MARQUES LOVE and TONY PERRY
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. VARTER, DAUSS and others
Not Classified By Court:
GREGORY L. LAKER, CONNER DICKERSON and MARK SNIDERMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PERRY v. REAGAL et al
as 1:2023cv01041
Plaintiff:
TONY PERRY
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGAL, CENTURION MEDICAL PROVIDER, AGBOOLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PERRY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07169
Plaintiff:
TONY PERRY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Perry v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
as 3:2022cv00442
Petitioner:
Dreshawn Tony Perry
Respondent:
Secretary Florida Department Of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PERRY v. SECRETARY FL DEPT OF CORR
as 4:2022cv00159
Petitioner:
DRESHAWN TONY PERRY
Respondent:
SECRETARY FL DEPT OF CORR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perry v. Manna Pro Products, LLC
as 4:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
Toni Perry
Defendant:
Manna Pro Products, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Perry v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 3:2021cv00694
Plaintiff:
Toni Perry
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612
Perry v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv01570
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Toni Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perry v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv04158
Plaintiff:
Toni Perry
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perry v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv03666
Plaintiff:
Toni Perry
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
