Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Edwards v. South Carolina, The State of et al
as 4:2026cv04072
Plaintiff:
Timothy Tyrone Edwards, Jr.
Defendant:
South Carolina, The State of, Michael August, Dawn M. Hutchinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2 Job Discrimination
Yancy v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv11289
Plaintiff:
Tyron Yancy
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Arnold v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2026cv01144
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Arnold
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
GREEN v. LEONBERG
as 1:2026cv12066
Plaintiff:
WALTER TYRONE GREEN
Defendant:
GREGORY LEONBERG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
HUMPHREY v. ELY et al
as 1:2026cv01914
Plaintiff:
TYRONE HUMPHREY
Defendant:
BENAIAH ELY, MICHAEL GRIMES and BENJAMIN SIEGMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Marshall, III et al
as 3:2026cv50423
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Johnson
Defendant:
William K. Marshall, III, Rick Stover, Andre Vahe Matevousian and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Lammer
as 3:2026cv50416
Petitioner:
Tyrone Johnson
Respondent:
Brian Lammer
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lewis v. Riverside Regional Jail Authority et al
as 3:2026cv00932
Plaintiff:
Neicole Marie Lewis
Defendant:
Riverside Regional Jail Authority, Tojuanna Y Mack, Earnest L. Giles, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv07381
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Turner
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
