Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Adamides et al v. The City Of Rochester et al
as 6:2024cv06107
Plaintiff:
Katherine Adamides, Tyrus Asa Adams, Joe Allman and others
Defendant:
The City Of Rochester, Henry Favor, Naser Zenelovic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00347
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Daigle et al v. City of Oceanside et al
as 3:2020cv01638
Defendant:
Tyrus Moulder, County of San Diego, Katie Brunacini and others
Plaintiff:
Hunter Willow Munsterman, R.A.Q, Deborah Lee Carman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 d
ALPHONSE v. PRATHER et al
as 4:2020cv00052
Defendant:
JEREMY MCCULLOUGH, DANIELLE FORTE, MARC DANTONIO and others
Plaintiff:
TYRUS KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv11294
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ed
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv12279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Crossroads Residents Organized for Stable and Secure ResiDencieS (CROSSRDS) et al v. MSP Crossroads Apartments LLC et al
as 0:2016cv00233
Defendant:
MSP Crossroads Apartments LLC and Soderberg Apartment Specialists
Plaintiff:
Crossroads Residents Organized for Stable and Secure ResiDencieS (CROSSRDS) , Linda Lee Soderstrom , Maria Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
