Cases 31 - 40 of 1,288
ADAMS v. U.S. MARSHALS
as 5:2023cv04195
Plaintiff:
KRISTI ADAMS
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lonon v. Wilhoite et al
as 4:2023cv00310
Plaintiff:
China Lonon
Defendant:
Matthew C. Wilhoite, Brian Deal and U.S. Marshal's Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv00390
Plaintiff:
Joseph P. Smith
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland and U.S. Marshals Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Howell v. F.B.I. et al
as 1:2023cv14607
Plaintiff:
Anthony T Howell
Defendant:
F.B.I., U.S. Marshals and U.S. Agents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Riemer v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 5:2023cv05161
Plaintiff:
Thomas Matthew Riemer
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service, Acting U.S. Marshal Mike Oglesby, Kara's Correctional Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HEMPHILL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv02865
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL ANTIONE HEMPHILL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BIDEN ADMINISTRATION, JULIAN CASTRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dudley v. U.S. Marshal Director
as 4:2023cv00659
Plaintiff:
Gene E Dudley
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kleinberg v. U.S. Federal Court et al
as 1:2023cv13827
Plaintiff:
Monisha Kleinberg
Defendant:
U.S. Federal Court, U.S. Marshals and U.S. Federal Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
STARKS v. U.S MARSHALS SERVICE
as 1:2023cv01612
Plaintiff:
BRANDI STARKS
Defendant:
U.S MARSHALS SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Jones v. Tisdale
as 23-50637
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Frank Alonzo Jones, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Roderick Tisdale, Officer, Jason Petty, Officer and Michael May, U.S. Marshal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
