Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00331
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad
Jackson v. US Steel Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv01967
Plaintiff:
William Jackson
Defendant:
US Steel Corporation , United States Steelworkers Union , Tom Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hardy v. Crane Co. et al
as 1:2017cv10826
Defendant:
Crane Co., Carrier Corporation, CBS Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
FMC Corporation and Bayer Cropscience, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Riley Power Inc., A. W. Chesterton Co., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Hardy
Not Classified By Court:
Judge Robert B. Collings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
DOOLEY v. US STEEL WORKERS OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv00402
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH A. DOOLEY
Defendant:
US STEEL WORKERS OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv12680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks et al v. Nett et al
as 5:2014cv00983
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks, Spence Taylor and John Michael
Defendant:
Elizabeth Nett, Ralph Shrader, Booz Allen Hamilton Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
