Cases 11 - 20 of 70
Verhines v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 3:2020cv01886
Plaintiff:
Spencer VERHINES and Christopher James
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Phllix Sinclair v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 2:2019cv08365
Plaintiff:
Phillix Sinclair
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc. doing business as Uber Eats
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
CALABRESE et al v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv18371
Plaintiff:
JAMES CALABRESE, GREGORY CABANILLAS and MATTHEW MECHANIC
Defendant:
RAISER, LLC and UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SMITH v. KHOSROWSHAHI et al
as 2:2019cv04242
Plaintiff:
REINARD SMITH
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., BARNEY HARFORD, GARRETT CAMP and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Haynie v. Uber Technologies Inc
as 4:2019cv00336
Plaintiff:
Bart Haynie
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Phillip Haskett v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 19-1116
Plaintiff:
VICTOR TEIXEIRA, MAILE CAPERS-CRISTOBAL, ALECE ALEXANDER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., JOHN DOES I-V and RASIER, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILLIP DAVID HASKETT
Abulzahab et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv12658
Plaintiff:
Alie Soufan, Roy Gendron, Derek Thomas and others
Defendant:
Rasier, LLC, Nelson Chai, Dara Khosrowshahi and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Uber Technologies, Inc. v. Bizounouya
as 1:2018cv12120
Respondent:
daourou bizounouya
Petitioner:
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Thomas v. Uber Technologies Inc.
as 1:2018cv02433
Plaintiff:
Steve L. Thomas
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mwithiga v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00768
Plaintiff:
Peter Mwithiga
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
