Cases 1 - 10 of 651
Nails and Staples, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America et al
as 6:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Nails and Staples, Inc. The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Nails and Staples, Inc. doing business as Express Interiors
Defendant:
Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America and Direct Steel, LLC
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
Paramount Mechanical Corp. v. Coakley & Williams Construction Company et al
as 1:2024cv00763
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the use and benefit of Paramount Mechanical Corporation and Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP
Defendant:
Coakley & Williams Construction Company, Corporation Service Company, Western Surety Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3133 Miller Act
Grassfield Plumbing, Inc. et al v. Within Interior Design, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Grassfield Plumbing, Inc. and The United States of America for the use and benefit of Grassfield Plumbing, Inc.
Defendant:
Within Interior Design, Inc. A Virginia Corporation doing business as Tazewell Contracting and Markel Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3133 Miller Act
The United States of America v. Swiss Re Corporate Solutions America Insurance Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv01277
Plaintiff:
The United States of America for the use and benefit of Local Electric, LLC
Defendant:
Swiss Re Corporate Solutions America Insurance Corporation f/k/a North American Specialty Insurance Company and New Age Development Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Kalkreuth Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc. v. Concierge Business Solutions, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of: Kalkreuth Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc.
Defendant:
Concierge Business Solutions, Inc. and American Alternative Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF D. HAYES ENTERPRISE, LLC v. Justin J. Reeves, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00868
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF D. HAYES ENTERPRISE, LLC
Defendant:
Justin J. Reeves, LLC and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America For the Use and Benefit of Maranatha Sheet Metal, Inc. v. Stronghold Engineering, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
United States of America For the Use and Benefit of Maranatha Sheet Metal, Inc., a California corporation
Defendant:
Stronghold Engineering, Inc., a California corporation and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, A Massachusetts Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of Norco Manufacturing Corp v. Core Tech International Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF NORCO MANUFACTURING CORP. d/b/a/ NORCO INDUSTRIAL DOORS and United States of America for the use and benefit of Norco Manufacturing Corp doing business as Norco Industrial Doors
Defendant:
CORE TECH INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, AMEC ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC, Zurich American Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Upper Room Masonry Company Limited Liability Partnership v. Russell Construction Co., Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
United States for the Use and Benefit of Upper Room Masonry Company Limited Liability Partnership d/b/a Upper Room Masonry Company and Upper Room Masonry Company Limited Liability Partnership d/b/a Upper Room Masonry Company, United States of America for the use and benefit of the foregoing
Defendant:
Russell Construction Co., Inc and Federal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
United States of America, v. Hirani Engineering & Land Surveying, PC, et al
as 24-7020
Plaintiff:
United States of America, for the use and benefit of American Civil Construction, LLC
Defendant:
Hirani Engineering & Land Surveying, PC and Colonial Surety Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
