Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Jalam Smith v. Lutheran University Association Inc.
as 24-1710
Plaintiff:
JALAM V. SMITH
Defendant:
LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION INC.
Smith v. United States
as 3:2023cv01198
Plaintiff:
Dyane V. Smith
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Venue
Smith v. Nerstad
as 0:2021cv01703
Plaintiff:
Derrick V Smith
Defendant:
Mr. Nerstad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Schoenfelder
as 0:2021cv01704
Plaintiff:
Derrick V Smith
Defendant:
Schoenfelder and Olmsted County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tandon et al v. Newsom et al
as 5:2020cv07108
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA, Jeffrey V. Smith, Sandra Shewry and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Wong, Carolyn Gannon, Julie Evarkiou and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kazalonis v. Harney County Oregon et al
as 2:2020cv01605
Defendant:
Charles V. Smith, Unknown Assistant District Attorney for Harney County Oregon, Brian J. Needham and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Kazalonis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Methodist Hospitals of Dallas et al
as 3:2020cv02799
Defendant:
S. Bachman (Badge # 519) Individually, Methodist Hospitals of Dallas d/b/a Methodist Charlton and d/b/a Methodist Health System Police Dept., V. Smith (Badge #492), Individually and others
Plaintiff:
Carol Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harrison v. Methodist Hospitals of Dallas et al
as 3:2020cv00247
Defendant:
Michael Olantunji, Methodist Hospitals of Dallas, V Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Carol Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith et al v. Garrnett et al
as 1:2016cv02236
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Smith, William V. Smith and Michael L. Smith
Defendant:
Tracy Garrnett, Greg Palese, Shirley Sowzioral and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Hardwick
as 2:2014cv30549
Plaintiff:
Eric V. Smith
Defendant:
D. (David) L. Hardwick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
