Cases 1 - 10 of 213
Vanhorn v. Hamilton et al
as 1:2024cv03389
Defendant:
Angela Jones Hamilton, R B Humphreys Inc. and Arch Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Dexter Vanhorn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Vanhorn et al v. Lape
as 2:2024cv03597
Plaintiff:
Paul Vanhorn, Jerry Knott, Anis Bared and others
Defendant:
Alex Lape
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jerry Aldridge, et al v. Regions Bank
as 24-5603
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BROWN, MARGUERITE DUFFY, EDNA T. CALDWELL and others
Defendant:
REGIONS BANK
Goodson v. Bouchard et al
as 4:2024cv11460
Defendant:
B. Rushing, Terry Moore, Jonathan Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan Christopher Goodson
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BUCHANAN v. VANHORN et al
as 2:2024cv00600
Plaintiff:
SHAWN C. BUCHANAN
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER JOSHUA VANHORN, GEORGIA L. STONE, JOHN MEEHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUCKNER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2023cv03524
Plaintiff:
MICHEAL W. BUCKNER, MICHAEL O. MCKOWN, PAUL PICCOLINI and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
VanHorn v. Williams, et al.
as 23-3647
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD L. VANHORN
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, SR. and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Dao v. Gibbs et al
as 5:2023cv05756
Plaintiff:
Cuong Huy Dao
Defendant:
A. Gibbs, C. Vanhorn, E. Auimine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Teodeosio, et al
as 5:2023cv02046
Plaintiff:
Michelle Wright
Defendant:
Judge Linda Tucci Teodosio, Suzi Shae, Shushila Moor and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
