Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Hall v.United States of America
as 1:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Paul Scott Hall
Defendant:
Veterans Admin and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
JOHNSON v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN ADMIN MEDICAL CENTER
as 1:2023cv00780
Plaintiff:
BELINDA G. JOHNSON
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN ADMIN MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00135
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hall v. Veterans Admin
as 2:2022cv00040
Plaintiff:
Paul Scott Hall
Defendant:
Veterans Admin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Murphy v. V.A. Veterans Admin.
as 3:2021cv01405
Plaintiff:
Arthur Murphy
Defendant:
V.A. Veterans Admin.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson v. Veterans Admin. M. Center
as 5:2011cv00661
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jackson
Defendant:
Veterans Admin. M. Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennedy v. Cleveland Veterans Admin. Medical Center et al
as 1:2011cv02025
Defendant:
Cleveland Veterans Admin. Medical Center and Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
William Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Parks v. USA et al
as 3:2009cv01162
Plaintiff:
William A. Parks
Defendant:
USA, Barack Obama, Social Security Admin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parks v. USA et al
as 3:2009mc00246
Plaintiff:
William A. Parks
Defendant:
USA, Barack Obama, Social Security Admin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JACKSON v. GMAC, INSURANCE et al
as 1:2009cv00868
Plaintiff:
RONALD J. JACKSON
Defendant:
GMAC, INSURANCE, AVERY & ASSOCIATES and VETERANS ADMIN HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
