Cases 11 - 20 of 136
Ronald Saintil v. Borough of Carteret, et al
as 22-2898
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SAINTIL
Defendant / Appellee:
BOROUGH OF CARTERET, CARTERET POLICE DEPARTMENT, TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON and others
Daniel Collins v. Donald Ames
as 22-7142
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL W. COLLINS
Respondent / Appellee:
DONALD F. AMES, Superintendent
Collins v. Ames
as 1:2022cv00082
Petitioner:
Daniel W. Collins
Respondent:
Donald Ames
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sowell v. Barber
as 22-20060
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kenneth Sowell
Defendant / Appellee:
Mark A. Barber, doctor, the State of Texas at the Texas Department of Corrections, Betty J. Williams, Doctor for the State of Texas at the Texas Department of Corrections, Ramon Saucedo, Doctor for the State of Texas at the Texas Department of Corrections and others
Kenneth Sowell v. Mark Barber, et al
as 20-20519
Defendant / Appellee:
Niya W. Collins, John Doe, nurse, Chancy Sessions and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kenneth Sowell
Aetna Life Insurance Company v. Collins et al
as 3:2020cv01057
Defendant:
Jerrell Brown, Jerel Brown and David W. Collins
Plaintiff:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
COLLINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv06766
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN W COLLINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PORTER v. INCH et al
as 4:2020cv00230
Defendant:
Z CULPEPPER, M HOOD, KIM MINER and others
Plaintiff:
AARON C PORTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Warden
as 3:2020cv00326
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Thomas W Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COLLINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv59650
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN W COLLINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
