Cases 1 - 10 of 14
GARCIA v. WALGREEN CO. et al
as 2:2021cv00457
Defendant:
WALGREEN EASTERN CO., INC. and WALGREEN CO.
Plaintiff:
DANIEL GARCIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of Beckley, West Virginia v. Allergan PLC et al
as 5:2020cv00073
Defendant:
Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Allergan Sales, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of Beckley, West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Daniel Ramirez v. Walgreen Company
as 8:2020cv00784
Defendant:
Walgreen Company
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Howard Center, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2019op46010
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., CVS Health Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Howard Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Howard Center, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 5:2019cv00191
Defendant:
CVS Health Corporation, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., Walmart Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Howard Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Viirre v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 1:2019cv00062
Plaintiff:
Michael A Viirre
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. and Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moya v. Walgreen Co
as 2:2018cv01785
Defendant:
Walgreen Co
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Moya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walgreen Co. v. Bordelon et al
as 1:2018cv00193
Plaintiff:
Walgreen Co.
Defendant:
Carly Bordelon, Tamarah Rigsby and GS Pharmacy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Linsalata et al v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 1:2015cv01189
Plaintiff:
Jason Birnhak, David Fensterstock and Anthony Linsalata
Defendant:
GNC Holdings, Inc., Target Corporation, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Mobley v. Walgreen Co.
as 1:2015cv01798
Plaintiff:
William P. Mobley
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
